EA-PROS APRIL 2026
THE STATE OF THE STRATEGIC ASSISTANT
2026 Inaugural Edition
"The first report built specifically for the senior executive assistant operating at strategic altitude. Not a survey of all administrative professionals — a framework for the tier of the profession that is transforming fastest and being served least."
Published During Administrative Professionals Week · April 19–25, 2026
Powered by the Lee Malveaux Organizational Psychology Firm
Read the Report ↓
"The profession doesn't have a talent problem. It has a visibility and infrastructure problem."
A NOTE FROM THE FOUNDER
Letter From the Founder
I didn't plan to build EA-Pros.
For a decade, I worked inside boardrooms, corporate executive offices, and coaching suites — training senior leaders, building organizational frameworks, and advancing the way work is carried out at the highest levels of business. My firm, Lee Malveaux, existed to serve executives. That was the plan.
Then came a conference invitation. I was hired to speak to an audience of over 2,500 executive and administrative assistants. I walked in as a keynote speaker. I walked out as someone who had just witnessed something that changed the direction of our firm.
What I saw in that room was hunger. Real, unfiltered professional hunger. I saw talent that rivaled anything I had witnessed in a C-suite. I saw people who were already operating at strategic altitude — managing decisions, not just calendars; driving outcomes, not just coordinating logistics; serving as the executive's most trusted thinking partner — with no formal recognition, no career architecture, and no executive and organizational psychology research built specifically for them.
I also saw something else. I saw a room full of what I can only call underdogs. Professionals who, whether they knew it or not, were approaching the most critical moment in the history of their profession. AI was accelerating. Roles were bifurcating. The career ladder they had climbed was reaching its structural ceiling. And the frameworks, the certifications, the development programs available to them — almost none of it was built for where they were actually operating.

The choice was clear for my team and I. We could observe this moment. Or we could do something about it. We chose to do something.
EA-Pros was born as a branch of the Organizational Psychology Firm with a singular mission: to elevate the executive assistant profession from transactional support to strategic partnership — equipping senior EAs with the identity, skills, and market positioning to create measurable ROI for organizations, executives, and transformational outcomes for individuals.
We are establishing the Certified Strategic Partner℠ as the industry gold standard. We are reversing decades of undervaluation. And we are building the frameworks, the tools, and the research infrastructure this profession has deserved for a long time.
This report is the first act of that infrastructure. It is not a survey of all administrative professionals. It is a focused, research-grounded examination of what is happening at the top of this profession — the tier I call the Strategic Assistant — and what it means for how you are seen, how you are paid, and how far you can go.
Administrative Professionals Week has been recognized since 1952. Seventy-four years. It is time this week came with something more than flowers and lunch. It is time to be seen.
Joshua Washington
Founder, EA-Pros
Organizational Psychologist · Senior Executive Coach
Lee Malveaux Organizational Psychology Firm
2026 INAUGURAL EDITION
Key Findings at a Glance
Finding 01 — Pay vs. Value
70% of administrative professionals received a pay increase in 2026 — yet the sense of being valued in the profession declined by more than 5% in the same period. Pay is not the problem. Recognition, strategic utilization, and career architecture are.
ASAP 2026 State of the Profession Report
Finding 02 — The Structural Gap
40% of administrative professionals with 10+ years of experience and college degrees report having zero strategic-level responsibilities. This is not a talent gap. It is a structural gap — and it costs organizations the most expensive resource they have: proximity to the executive.
ASAP 2026 State of the Profession Report
Finding 03 — AI Bifurcation
AI adoption among administrative professionals more than doubled in a single year — from 26% to 53%. The profession is bifurcating in real time: those who deploy AI strategically are reclaiming hundreds of hours annually; those who do not are watching their scope compress.
ASAP 2025 State of the Profession; CCing My EA 2025 State of AI in the EA Industry
Finding 04 — The Career Ladder Ceiling
483,570 executive assistants in the United States. Approximately 48,000 Chief of Staff positions. The traditional career ladder has reached its mathematical limit — and entry-level administrative roles face a projected 13% employment decline through 2034. The profession is not shrinking. It is restructuring.
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Finding 05 — The Compensation Spread
The top 5% of executive assistants now earn more than $130,000 in base compensation. The total spread from bottom to top of the market exceeds $90,000. This gap cannot be explained by tenure or geography. Four specific variables explain most of it — and three of them are within your control.
EA-Pros Compensation Research; Executive Assistant Institute 2025
Finding 06 — The ROI of Development
Organizations investing in strategic EA development see 2.3x higher retention beyond three years. Replacing a senior EA costs $50,000–$75,000. The math is unambiguous: development costs less than departure, and strategic development produces measurably more executive productivity.
EA-Pros Research; Wilson Learning meta-analysis, 32 studies
SECTION ONE
Why This Report Exists
The administrative profession has been studied, surveyed, and benchmarked annually for years. ASAP has produced the largest benchmarking survey for administrative professionals since 2020, drawing on more than 3,700 respondents in its 2025 edition and an even broader base in 2026. Vimcal published a data-backed study of 600 EAs covering salary, AI adoption, job satisfaction, and tools. Executive Support Magazine provides international perspective. The Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks employment and wage data annually.
The data exists. The profession is documented.

What is missing is not data — it is a framework for the specific tier of the profession that is transforming fastest and being served least: the senior executive assistant who is no longer functioning as an administrative professional and has not yet been given the infrastructure, the title, or the compensation that reflects what she is actually doing.
This report names that tier: the Strategic Assistant.
It does not describe a job title. It describes a mode of professional operation — a level of executive partnership characterized by measurable competencies, quantifiable organizational value, and a career architecture that is distinct from both the Senior EA below it and the Chief of Staff above it.
And it introduces the instrument that EA-Pros has built to measure it: the Strategic Assistant Competency Model℠ — a seven-domain research-validated framework built on organizational and executive psychology and grounded in the same academic methodology that SHRM uses to certify HR professionals across 700+ university programs.
This report exists because the profession has been celebrated every April for 74 years with flowers, lunches, and thank-you cards. It is time it was celebrated with something it has never had: a research-backed framework that sees what it is actually becoming — and gives every person in it the language, the data, and the tools to claim what they are worth.
SECTION TWO
Three Forces Reshaping the Profession
The EA profession is not gradually evolving. It is being restructured by three converging forces that are accelerating simultaneously — and the organizations and individuals that understand what is happening are gaining ground while those who do not are losing it.
Force One
AI Is Rewriting the Role in Real Time
Force Two
Executive Complexity Is Outpacing Support Infrastructure
Force Three
Retention Risk Is Compounding
FORCE ONE
AI Is Rewriting the Role in Real Time
53%
AI Adoption
Administrative professionals using AI in 2025, up from 26% the prior year
2x
Adoption Rate
AI adoption more than doubled in a single twelve-month reporting cycle
Administrative AI adoption more than doubled in twelve months — from 26% to 53%, according to ASAP's consecutive State of the Profession surveys. This is not incremental adoption. This is a structural shift happening inside a single reporting cycle.
What AI is doing to the executive assistant profession is precisely what it has done to every knowledge-work role it has touched: it is compressing the execution layer and expanding the judgment layer. Scheduling, email drafting, document preparation, research summaries, travel logistics — tasks that once consumed the majority of an EA's week are now being partially or fully automated.
The EAs who have learned to deploy AI strategically are not being replaced. They are being amplified. They are reclaiming hundreds of hours annually that are being reinvested in the work AI cannot do: executive relationship management, strategic decision support, cross-functional coordination, institutional knowledge curation, and the human judgment that turns data into action.
The EAs who have not made this shift are not yet in crisis — but they are watching their strategic scope compress as organizations restructure support functions around AI-enhanced workflows. The gap between these two populations is widening every quarter.

AI is not the threat to this profession. Passivity in response to AI is.
FORCE TWO
Executive Complexity Is Outpacing Support Infrastructure
75%
Overwhelmed Managers
HR leaders reporting that managers are overwhelmed by expanding responsibilities (Gartner 2025)
72%
Burnout Crisis
Workers saying organizations could do more, despite acknowledging progress (SHRM 2026)
125
Hours Recovered
Average executive hours reclaimed annually through strategic EA development (EA-Pros data)
CEOs and senior executives in 2026 face a fundamentally different scope of responsibility than they faced a decade ago. Faster decision cycles. Hybrid and distributed team coordination. Expanding regulatory and compliance demands. Stakeholder relationships multiplying across constituents. The information load alone — the volume of communication, reporting, and decision inputs that reaches an executive's desk in a given week — has grown at a pace that outstrips any individual's capacity to process it without strategic support.
The executive assistant is the most proximate resource an organization has to absorb this complexity. No other professional role combines the executive's level of trust, the institutional context to make judgment calls, and the operational scope to act on behalf of the executive without constant direction. This is a structural organizational advantage that most companies are not deliberately deploying because they do not have the framework to see it.
EA-Pros coaching data shows that organizations developing EAs at strategic altitude reclaim an average of 125 hours of executive time annually through improved prioritization, delegation, and decision support. For a $500,000 executive, that is $62,500 in recovered productivity per year.
The infrastructure to produce this outcome does not yet exist in most organizations. Building it is the opportunity.
FORCE THREE
Retention Risk Is Compounding
The ASAP 2026 State of the Profession report surfaced a paradox that sits at the center of this conversation: 70% of administrative professionals received a pay increase in 2026 — and yet the sense of being valued in the profession declined by more than 5% in the same period.
This finding requires explanation, and the explanation is this: pay is not recognition. Pay is a transaction. Recognition is the organizational acknowledgment that a professional's strategic contribution is seen, named, and valued at the altitude at which it is actually operating.
68%
Quit Reason
Employees who quit cite lack of career growth as primary reason (Gallup)
2.3x
Retention Lift
Higher retention beyond 3 years for organizations investing in strategic EA development
Senior EAs who are operating at Strategic Assistant altitude — managing executive decision flow, owning cross-functional coordination, driving organizational outcomes — are receiving pay adjustments while watching their strategic contribution remain invisible in development plans, succession discussions, and performance frameworks. The pay increase says: you are important to us. The absence of structural recognition says: but not in a way we have language for.
Gallup research documents that 68% of employees who quit cite lack of career growth as their primary reason. EA-Pros research and coaching engagements across organizations including Capital One, Chase, Amazon, and Target have consistently found that the EAs most at risk of departure are not the ones with compensation concerns — they are the ones whose strategic capacity is being underutilized.

Replacing a senior EA costs $50,000–$75,000 in recruiting, onboarding, and lost institutional knowledge. Organizations investing in strategic EA development see 2.3x higher retention beyond three years. The math requires no interpretation.
SECTION THREE
The Strategic Assistant, Defined
The phrase "Strategic Assistant" is not a new job title for an existing role. It is a definition — a naming of a mode of professional operation that already exists, performed daily by thousands of senior EAs across the country, that has not yet been given the institutional language required to be seen for what it is.
The Strategic Assistant Is the EA Who:
Decision-Filtering Partner
Operates as a decision-filtering partner for the executive, not a task-execution resource
Organizational Complexity Manager
Manages organizational complexity and cross-functional relationships on behalf of the executive
Anticipatory Strategist
Anticipates strategic needs and drives outcomes without requiring constant direction
ROI Quantifier
Quantifies her contribution in terms of executive productivity, organizational capacity, and measurable ROI
AI Strategist
Deploys AI and technology strategically to amplify her scope rather than simply automate her tasks
Executive-Altitude Communicator
Communicates at executive altitude — influencing decisions, managing up, and navigating organizational dynamics without formal authority
The Strategic Assistant Competency Model℠
EA-Pros has built the Strategic Assistant Competency Model℠ — a seven-domain framework grounded in organizational and executive psychology research, using the same academic architecture that SHRM applies to HR professional development across 700+ university programs and AACSB applies to business school accreditation.
Each domain includes three proficiency levels — Foundation, Advanced, and Expert — with specific behavioral indicators that give both the EA and the organization a clear, shared rubric for assessment, development, and career progression.
Career Tier Comparison

The Strategic Assistant tier is the missing infrastructure between Senior EA and executive level positions — and it is the tier that 40% of experienced, credentialed administrative professionals are already operating in without recognition, development support, or appropriate compensation.
SECTION FOUR
The Compensation Reality
The executive assistant profession has a compensation architecture that most of its practitioners do not fully understand — and that gap in understanding is costing them money.
The top 5% of executive assistants in the United States now earn more than $130,000 in base compensation, and the spread from the bottom of the market to the top exceeds $90,000. National average base salary data ranges from $35,000 at entry level to $104,000+ for senior-level EAs with a decade or more of experience in high-complexity roles. In tier-one markets — New York, San Francisco, Washington D.C., Boston — senior EA compensation regularly exceeds $90,000 in base alone, with total compensation packages significantly higher.
The gap at the top of this market is not explained primarily by tenure or geography. Four specific variables explain the majority of the $90,000+ spread.
1
Role Complexity
The scope of what the EA owns — not what her title says, but what she actually manages — is the baseline driver of compensation. An EA who owns projects, manages vendors, builds internal processes, oversees a team, and serves as an executive proxy is performing a fundamentally different function than an EA who coordinates scheduling and correspondence. Both may hold the same title. Their market values are not the same.
2
Executive Level Supported
Compensation scales with the organizational altitude of the person supported. EAs to founder-CEOs, public company CEOs, and private equity principals command substantially higher compensation floors than EAs supporting VPs, directors, or department heads. The organizational risk of the partnership failing is higher, the confidentiality requirements are more demanding, and the judgment required operates at a premium.
3
Industry Premium
Finance, technology, healthcare, and legal consistently pay above general-market rates for senior EA talent. The premium in tier-one financial services and technology can run 20–35% above the national senior EA median. If you are a senior EA in one of these industries and you are not accounting for industry premium in your compensation benchmarking, you are measuring yourself against the wrong market.
4
Strategic Scope
This is the variable most EAs undercount — and it is the single largest predictor of top-quartile compensation. Strategic scope means: are you operating as an executor or as a partner? Are you managing your executive's calendar, or are you managing their priorities? EAs who can articulate their strategic scope and quantify it consistently command 25–40% higher compensation than equally tenured peers who cannot.
Variable Deep Dive: What Drives the $90,000+ Spread
Variable 1: Role Complexity
An EA who owns projects, manages vendors, builds internal processes, oversees a team, and serves as an executive proxy in meetings is performing a fundamentally different function than an EA who coordinates scheduling and correspondence. Both may hold the same title. Their market values are not the same.
Variable 2: Executive Level Supported
Compensation scales with the organizational altitude of the person supported. EAs to founder-CEOs, public company CEOs, and private equity principals command substantially higher compensation floors. The organizational risk of the partnership failing is higher, and the judgment required operates at a premium.
Variable 3: Industry Premium
Finance, technology, healthcare, and legal consistently pay above general-market rates. The premium in tier-one financial services and technology can run 20–35% above the national senior EA median. If you are not accounting for industry premium in your benchmarking, you are measuring yourself against the wrong market.
Variable 4: Strategic Scope
The single largest predictor of top-quartile compensation. EAs who can articulate their strategic scope and quantify it in terms of executive time recovered, decisions influenced, and organizational capacity created consistently command 25–40% higher compensation than equally tenured peers who cannot.
The Fifth Variable: AI Fluency
AI is now layering a fifth variable on top of these four. Research indicates that AI-fluent senior EAs are already commanding compensation premiums of 15–25% over equally tenured peers who have not yet made the strategic AI transition.
As AI becomes a baseline expectation rather than a differentiator, this premium will compress — but the organizations and individuals who move early will have locked in the advantage.
25%
AI Premium
Compensation premium for AI-fluent senior EAs over equally tenured peers

The compensation gap you are experiencing is not random. It is structural. And three of the four primary variables are entirely within your control.
SECTION FIVE
The Perception Gap
The most important finding in this inaugural edition is not a number. It is a pattern.
In 2026, ASAP's State of the Profession research documented something that EA-Pros has observed consistently across coaching engagements, organizational assessments, and community conversations: 70% of administrative professionals received a pay increase this year, and the sense of being valued in the profession declined by more than 5% in the same period.
Pay went up. Perceived value went down. In the same year. For the same population.

This paradox has a name: The Perception Gap.

The Perception Gap is the measurable delta between the strategic value a senior EA is producing and the strategic value her organization, her executive, her HR function — and sometimes even she herself — formally recognizes. It is not a feeling. It is a structural condition created by the absence of a framework capable of seeing what is actually happening in the strategic EA role.
The Perception Gap Shows Up in Four Ways
Underutilization
40% of APs with 10+ years of experience and college degrees report having zero strategic-level responsibilities. This is not because they are incapable of strategic contribution. It is because no one has built the infrastructure to engage it. A Global Assistant survey found 70% of EAs feel undervalued and overlooked — not because their organizations are indifferent, but because the mechanisms to recognize strategic contribution at this level do not exist in most companies.
Invisibility in Development
Senior EAs are routinely absent from leadership development programs, succession planning discussions, and the performance infrastructure applied to every other comparably compensated professional in the organization. This is not deliberate exclusion — it is categorical error. The EA is classified as administrative support, so her development is routed through administrative channels, if it is funded at all.
Compensation Lag
EAs operating at Strategic Assistant altitude are regularly compensated at Senior EA ranges because no one has named the tier they occupy. Without the category, there is no compensation benchmark. Without the benchmark, there is no business case for the adjustment. The EA does the work of a Strategic Assistant and earns the salary of a Senior EA — not because the organization is unfair, but because it is missing the vocabulary.
Attrition
The EAs most capable of strategic contribution are the most likely to leave for organizations that can see them. Gallup's data on career growth as the primary driver of voluntary attrition applies with particular force here: the professional who has outgrown the recognition infrastructure of her current organization will eventually find one that has not.
Closing the Gap: The EA Value Suite
The EA Value Suite was built to close this gap — to give every senior EA in the profession the instruments to make her invisible strategic contribution visible: to herself, to her executive, and to the organization. Every tool in the suite, from the Career Ascension Map to the Executive Time Optimizer, is a data-generating instrument for the Perception Gap.
The Report
Names the condition — The Perception Gap — and establishes the research framework
The Tools
Measure it — eight free instruments in the EA Value Suite quantify strategic contribution
The Credential
Credentials the solution — the Certified Strategic Partner℠ program (ElevateEA Master Strategy Class)
SECTION SIX
The Strategic Readiness Self-Assessment
Where are you on the map?
The Strategic Readiness Self-Assessment is a twelve-question instrument — one question per competency domain in the Strategic Assistant Competency Model℠ — that produces a personalized Strategic Readiness Profile for every respondent.
It is not a quiz. It is a diagnostic. Completing it gives you a scored profile across all seven domains, identifies your highest-leverage development opportunity, and benchmarks your results against the EA-Pros community of practitioners.
The assessment takes approximately four minutes. Completing it this week contributes your anonymized, aggregated data to the 2027 full edition of this report — which will, for the first time, publish Strategic Readiness benchmarks segmented by industry, company size, career level, and geographic market.
This Is How the Inaugural Edition Becomes the Annual Edition
Every reader who completes the assessment is a data point. Every data point improves the benchmark. By Administrative Professionals Week 2027, this report will publish the most precise, research-backed picture of strategic readiness in the executive assistant profession that has ever existed.
The assessment is the bridge between this inaugural edition and the research infrastructure that will define the profession's future. Your four minutes matter.
SECTION SEVEN
The EA Value Suite — Eight Tools, Zero Cost
EA-Pros released the EA Value Suite during Administrative Professionals Week 2026 as a gift to the profession: eight free strategic tools, each built on organizational and executive psychology research, designed to give every senior EA in the country data-backed instruments for the conversations that matter most.
Career Ascension Map
Scores your career level across five dimensions and identifies exactly what is holding you back from the next tier
EA vs. AI Value Analyzer
Quantifies how much of your work is uniquely human and what that strategic contribution is worth in real dollars
EA Workload Capacity Index
Determines whether you are carrying more than one person should and gives you the language to address it
Job Offer Comparison Tool
Compares a new offer to your current package in real dollars, not just base salary
EA Market Value Calculator
Shows whether your current salary is fair for your experience, location, and role complexity
Raise Request Predictor
Finds the right number to ask for and prepares your talking points for the salary conversation
Strategic Meeting Prep Auditor
Determines exactly how much prep time any meeting deserves and where to invest it
Executive Time Optimizer
Maps how your executive's time is being spent and quantifies how much of it you can help recover

Every tool is free. Completely free. Because this profession has spent decades paying for development resources built for someone else's career. These tools were built for yours.
SECTION EIGHT
What Comes Next — The 2027 Annual Edition
This is the Inaugural Edition. It is built on existing research, EA-Pros coaching and organizational data, and the professional frameworks developed by the Lee Malveaux Organizational Psychology Firm. It names the category. It establishes the framework. It releases the tools.
The 2027 Annual Edition will have original survey data. Here is what it will measure:
The Perception Gap Index
The first formal, industry-scale measurement of the delta between EA strategic output and organizational recognition — segmented by industry, company size, executive level, and career tier
Strategic Readiness Scores
Benchmarked results from the Strategic Readiness Self-Assessment, published at national, industry, and career-level resolution
The AI Amplification Map
Which tasks are being displaced by AI versus amplified at each career tier, with data on how AI-fluent EAs are capturing the compensation premium
Executive-Side Perception Data
The first time this report will survey executives on what they actually value in the EA partnership and what the gap is between their stated expectations and the development their organizations are providing
Named Case Studies
Organizations formally building the Strategic Assistant tier and the measurable outcomes they are producing

The 2027 Annual Edition of the State of the Strategic Assistant will be released during Administrative Professionals Week, April 2027.

To contribute your data, take the Strategic Readiness Self-Assessment at EAProsHQ.com/assessment.
CLOSING
It Is Time to Be Seen
Administrative Professionals Week has been observed in the United States since 1952 — 74 years of flowers, lunches, and recognition cards.
It is not that the recognition is wrong. It is that the profession has become something that a card cannot contain.
The strategic EA in 2026 is managing executive decision flow, coordinating the organizational infrastructure that keeps a leadership team aligned. The EA is the institutional memory, the executive's thinking partner, the person closest to the organization's strategic center — who for so long has operated without an upgraded infrastructure.
EA-Pros exists to build that structure. This report is the document that names the moment.
Name the Tier
The Strategic Assistant is a defined, measurable mode of professional operation — not just a title
Build the Framework
The Strategic Assistant Competency Model℠ gives organizations and EAs a shared language for strategic contribution
Credential the Standard
The Certified Strategic Partner℠ designation is the profession's gold standard — the credential that proves strategic altitude
Published by EA-Pros
Joshua Washington
Founder, EA-Pros
Organizational Psychologist · Senior Executive Coach
Lee Malveaux Organizational Psychology Firm
EA-Pros is a branch of the Lee Malveaux Organizational Psychology Firm with a singular mission: to elevate the executive assistant profession from transactional support to strategic partnership — equipping senior EAs with the identity, skills, and market positioning to create measurable ROI for organizations and transformational outcomes for individuals.
© 2026 EA-Pros. All rights reserved.
Certified Strategic Partner℠ is a trademark of EA-Pros. Strategic Assistant Competency Model℠ is a trademark of EA-Pros.
SOURCES & CITATIONS
Research Sources
ASAP 2026 State of the Profession Report; ASAP 2025 State of the Profession Report; CCing My EA / Vimcal 2025 State of AI in the Executive Assistant Industry; Bureau of Labor Statistics Executive Secretaries and Administrative Assistants Employment Projections 2024–2034; Vimcal 2026 Report on the Administrative and Executive Assistant Profession; EA-Pros Organizational Research and Coaching Data 2024–2026; Gartner HR Leader Survey 2025; Gallup Employee Engagement Research; Wilson Learning Meta-Analysis, 32 Studies; Global Assistant Survey; SHRM Competency Model Architecture; Ibarra (1999) Working Identity; Ashforth (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life; O'Boyle et al. EI Meta-Analysis; Gerlach et al. (2020) Strategic Alignment Research; Zhang et al. Academy of Management Journal Leader-Follower Congruence; McKinsey Global Institute AI and the Future of Work; VitalSmarts 2,200-Project Communication Study.
The State of the Strategic Assistant · 2026 Inaugural Edition · Published April 2026 · EA-Pros · Powered by Lee Malveaux Organizational Psychology Firm